In October 2023, President Hilary L. Link, PhD, introduced efforts to develop an exciting new Strategic Vision and Direction for Drew University.
President Link noted the shared interest at Drew to outline and communicate what a bold future for Drew will look like, and how to get there.
Guided by principles outlined by President Link, core tenets comprising the foundation of the Drew University experience (below), Drew’s mission statement, and stakeholder feedback, a working group of Drew faculty and staff developed a Strategic Framework that was delivered to President Link in May 2024. This was then reviewed by the Drew community for input from August-September 2024, and subsequently delivered to the Drew University Board of Trustees in October 2024.
With the Strategic Framework finalized, three subgroups of Drew faculty and staff were formed to conceptualize and prioritize tactics to guide day-to-day work in three focus areas: Financial Sustainability, One University, and LifeLong Learning. Their report was delivered in March 2025.
The Strategic Framework identified three key pillars to help Drew thrive as an institution and fulfill its mission:
Financial Stability
- Eliminate long-standing and structural budget deficits through increased revenues, strong fiscal management, optimal allocation of personnel resources, creative use of physical infrastructure, and planned divestment of land.
- Sustainably invest in academic, immersive, and co-curricular experiences to positively impact the recruitment and retention of undergraduate, graduate and lifelong learning students.
- Elevate engagement and philanthropic support from alumni, the greater Drew community, and foundations.
- Expand academic offerings beyond four-year or graduate degree programs to provide access and opportunities to a broader range of learners.
A Unified University
- Define and establish a cohesive identity grounded in the University’s core tenets, while promoting the uniqueness of the College of Liberal Arts, Caspersen School of Graduate Studies, and Drew Theological School to elevate the institutional brand and strengthen Drew’s market position.
- Commit to a deeper focus on diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility as a central priority at all levels of the University and in its practices and processes to drive systemic change and ensure all faculty, staff, and students feel valued as members of the community and can be their authentic selves.
- Collaborate across and within the University’s schools to support innovation, efficiency, data-driven decision making, and organizational success.
Lifelong Learning
- Establish a new model for higher education that involves flexible, accessible, affordable, and situational lifelong learning.
- Broaden academic offerings to appeal to a wide range of learners from those without a traditional degree to Drew alumni or those who want to engage in a passion to workers looking to upskill, all informed by employer-identified needs and technological advances.
Core Tenets
In their meetings, the working group spent considerable time determining the core, interconnected tenets that comprise the foundation of the Drew University experience. These are:
-
- Rigorous Academics
- Purposeful Experiences
- Networked Mentorship
- Empowering and Inclusive Community
Innovation Committee
In March 2025, members from some of the previous planning groups along with additional community members began working together to focus around themes that came out of the visioning work and innovative ideas brought forward in the strategic planning process. They will build upon the bold and innovative work being done in Drew community, the planning processes that have been completed recently, and the ongoing innovation work being done in all areas of the university.
Timeline and Process
Timeline & Process
Introductory Meetings
- October 24: Cabinet, Working Group, Theological School Dean’s Office
- October 25: Arts & Sciences Dean’s Council, Representative Stakeholders Group 1, Drew Staff Association, CampusWorks
- October 26: Arts & Sciences Dean’s Office, Representative Stakeholders Group 2, Representative Stakeholders Group 3, Representative Stakeholders Group 4
- October 27: Theological School Dean’s Council, President Link, INTO Drew University
SWOT Matrix Review Meetings
- November 3: Working Group
SWOT Summary and Conversation on Strategic Issues
- November 10: Working Group
- November 29: Arts & Sciences Dean’s Council, Stakeholders Group 1, Drew Staff Association Executive Board, Cabinet
- November 30: Arts & Sciences Dean’s Office, Stakeholders Group 2, Theological School Dean’s Office, Stakeholders Group 3
- December 1: CampusWorks, Theological School Dean’s Council, INTO Drew University, Stakeholders Group 4
Strategic Planning Process and SWOT Summary Review
- November 29: Open Forum for Faculty and Staff
- November 30: Student Government Leaders
Discussions to Narrow Down Strategic Issues
- December 1: Working Group
SWOT Summary and Conversation on Strategic Issues
- December 7: Board of Trustees
Initial discussion of Strategic Issues List
- December 20: Working Group
Review of external ‘Who We Are’ messaging with Admissions, Advancement and Communications
- January 12: Working Group
Continued discussion of “Who We Are” and Strategic Issues List
- January 16: Working Group
Review of Strategic Issues Categories and creation of draft Master List.
- January 19: Working Group
In-depth discussion of Strategic Issues
- January 23: Working Group
- January 25: Working Group
- January 30: Working Group
- February 7: Working Group
- February 9: Working Group
- February 13: Working Group
Review of Four Tenets with Strategic Questions
- February 12: Drew Staff Association, Stakeholders, Theological School Dean’s Council
- February 13: Cabinet, Stakeholders
- February 14: Arts & Sciences Dean’s Council, Arts & Sciences Dean’s Office, Student Government Leaders
- February 15: Theological School Dean’s Office, CampusWorks, Stakeholders, INTO Drew University
- February 16: Board of Trustees
In-depth discussion of Strategic Issues
- February 22: Working Group
- March 6: Working Group
- March 13: Working Group
-